Theatre of the Absurd Essay examples
1154 Words5 Pages
Theatre of the Absurd Essay.
The Theatre of the Absurd originated from experimental Arts of the avant-garde in the 1920’s and 30’s. It highlighted the meaning of life and came about as a result of the Second World War. It was also a result of absurd plays having a highly unusual, innovative form, aiming to startle the viewers.
In the Second World War, in the meaningless and godless post Second
World War world, it was no longer possible to keep using traditional art forms and standards that had ceased being convincing. It openly rebelled against conventional theatre. It was very anti-theatre, coming across as surreal, senseless and plotless. Samuel Beckett and
Harold Pinter were known as the ‘absurd’ play writers. They both…show more content…
‘Black and White’ has only two main characters as apposed to three in ‘Come and Go’.
In ‘Black and White’, the characters come across as being old, one being small and the other tall. They come across to us, the audience, as very shallow people with very little to talk about. They seem to be non-trusting characters. Evidence from the play suggests that the second of the two women is more of a threatening, aggressive character than the first, who comes across as a calmer woman. The second woman shows aggression when saying ‘I said, clear off out of it before I call a copper’. The first woman shows she is calmer, by not getting worked up over things. ‘I like a bit of bread with my soup’. In ‘Come and Go’, the atmosphere between the women has less tension. The women are not realistic but anonymous, with no identity. Towards the end of this play, it shows the characters are calm when Vi says ‘May we not speak of the old days? (Silence) Of what came after? (Silence) shall we hold hands in the old way?’ This suggests memories may be appearing and the characters don’t really want to bring the subject up.
The language used in these two plays is very similar. In ‘Black and
White’, the language is very colloquial and a lot of slang is used to emphasise the fact that they are in the bar having a typical woman’s chat. Pinter wrote this play with thought of building
Theatre of the Absurd is a genre of plays mainly produced in Europe in the 1950's and 60's. Some of the playwrights considered central to Theatre of the Absurd are Samuel Beckett, Eugène Ionesco, Jean Genet, Arthur Adamov, and Harold Pinter, author of The Dumb Waiter. Plays in the genre generally put forth the idea that life is random or meaningless and show humans struggling to find purpose and control. The plays generally have tones of negativity, tragedy, and boredom, though many also include elements of comedy. The Theatre of the Absurd movement also shocked audiences with revolutionary approaches to language, plot, and character. Compared to theatre of the early 20th century, poignant and metaphorical language and repetitive actions took the place of realistic dialogue and plot.
Theatre of the Absurd was popularized as a genre in large part by Samuel Beckett's 1952 play Waiting for Godot. The influence of Beckett on Pinter, and of Waiting for Godot on The Dumb Waiter, is clear. Both Waiting for Godot and The Dumb Waiter are absurdist, one-act plays in which two male characters wait for a third man to arrive. Both include repetitive dialogue, absurd actions, hierarchy, questions, and a lot of waiting. Pinter acknowledged this influence, once stating in an interview, “If Beckett’s influence shows in my work that’s all right with me. You don’t write in a vacuum: you’re bound to absorb and digest other writing and I admire Beckett’s work so much that something of its texture might appear in my own” (Sadreddini).
Two major elements of absurdity in The Dumb Waiter are lack of action and repetitive dialogue. For example, Gus tries to ask Ben questions throughout the play, but rarely gets answers. This leads to him asking the same question again or asking other questions, increasing the tension between the men but not advancing the plot. Ben finally lashes out at Gus about his questions, saying, "What's the matter with you? You're always asking me questions. What's the matter with you?...You never used to ask me so many damn questions. What's come over you?...Stop wondering. You've got a job to do. Why don't you just do it and shut up?" (99.) This quote again includes repetitive dialogue, and it clearly underscores themes of struggling with meaninglessness and lack of control.